This morning I received the following from Mervyn Barrett (@mervynbarrett) in response to the blog:
"@MervynBarrett: @J_amesp Hi, could you DM me your best contact details please - email etc. Many thanks, Mervyn"
Taking into consideration his failure to engage openly or repeat his initial comment I am not convinced his motive is to talk through the issues.
Subsequently I have posted two immediate replies:
"@J_amesp: @MervynBarrett on two conditions
1) explain your pensions comment in open forum
And
2) explain why you want my contact details in open forum"
And
"@J_amesp: @MervynBarrett I am also happy to host a reply and your feelings to the blog, or post an update incorporating your views. More than happy."
As yet I have received no reply.
Once I do I will happily take an appropriate course of action.
I make clear, I am more than happy to have my opinion changed and if he makes his wishes or thoughts crystalline: I will either post an updated blog with his side of the story or write a new blog incorporating both.
I believe this kind of discussion is exactly what open debate forums are for.
Once again, I am happy to do what is necessary to draw a satisfactory conclusion for us both.
That's the best way to end any discussion.
JP.
No comments:
Post a Comment